Video Claim Research

Follow the claim.
Inspect the evidence.

The workflow keeps the source, transcript, evidence, judgment, and audit state separate. This case asks whether ELU and MCP can make software fully self-improve.

Open the full PDF See the workflow
  • Open-source workflow
  • Experimental research sample
  • Source on GitHub
Original illustration of a video claim examined through a lens and checked against a source document.

The case at a glance

The claim

Software that fully
self-improves.

The finding

Assisted analysis.
Human review.

Inspect the report
Workflow
Plausible
Literal claim
Overstated
Confidence
Medium
Report
4 pages

Read the actual report

PDF / 4 pages
Page 2 of the report, with an original workflow diagram
Page 2: an original explanation of the proposed workflow.
Original diagram: usage data, AI analysis, proposed change, then human review and tests
Original evidence map distinguishing documented connections, plausible assistance, and unproven autonomy

Source reel: Instagram / DXwo4xAxmsG. Evidence reviewed 9 July 2026; publication revised 10 September 2026. Original diagrams only. No source-video imagery, personal ratings, or product validation.

Walk the evidence chain

Interactive / 6 stages
INTAKE

Preserve the source

Log the source link, date, publication context, and claim to be reviewed.

Input
Video link or local file
Output
Topic folder and links log
Stop
Private or inaccessible media without authorization

The route is part of the evidence

Current tool map
Choose an access routeAgent ReachInspect available backends for the source.
Use the appropriate tool Exa + mcporterpublic discovery Jina Readerordinary public pages Crawl4AIrendering fallback OpenCLIauthorized browser route yt-dlppermitted public media
Keep the evidence togetherResearch packetPrivate working material supports the public report. Only original visuals enter the release.
Agent Reach mcporter FFmpeg Whisper faster-whisper PySceneDetect Tesseract Playwright MCP Chrome DevTools MCP

These projects are credited routes and tools, not vendored code. A route may retrieve a source; it cannot establish that the source is true.

Use the research workflow

The GitHub repository contains the skills, scripts, report example, and source register. Read the setup guide and try the offline example first.

  1. Open the GitHub repository, read the README, and clone it to run locally.
  2. Create a topic from a source link or a video you can lawfully use.
  3. Follow the research stages, then run the packet audit before sharing the report.
View on GitHub Explore the website workflow

Public boundary

The report is public. The raw packet is not.

The public edition contains an original report, explanatory diagrams, source links, and publication checks. Source video, frames, transcripts, and private notes stay outside the release.

Open the PDF Browse source on GitHub

Explore other projects

AI Stock RadarCompany research · In development Website Creation WorkflowDesign, writing, and testing AgeHandoffAge verification · Browser-only demo